A Turning Point

The shooting of Charlie Kirk will shake the very foundations of the United States.

I believe, and I hope against all odds, that today will mark a Turning Point in American history.

If it was not clear after the attempted assassination of President Trump, or after the cold-blooded murder of a healthcare CEO, it should be clear now. A significant portion of the country has been radicalized beyond belief. Not everyone will pick up a gun, but when enough people are conditioned to see violence as acceptable, it only takes a few to bring a democracy to its knees.

Charlie Kirk built his career on free speech and debate. He was not a man who thrived on hiding in safe spaces or screaming slogans. He walked straight into hostile territory and made the case for his ideas. He let his opponents speak and then responded. He faced hecklers, interruptions, jeers, and he answered them with arguments. He believed that persuasion mattered, that talking across divides was still possible in America. That a man like that could become a target for assassination tells us how far we have drifted from even the minimum standards of a free society.

Political violence does not appear out of nowhere. It grows in a culture where opponents are described as monsters, where dehumanization is normalized, where victory is defined not by winning an argument but by silencing an adversary. Slogans like “resistance” and “by any means necessary” have been repeated so often that violence is no longer shocking. It has become a kind of background noise. When the other side is described as Nazis, fascists, terrorists, or demons, there is no room left for argument. Once you accept that framing, why wouldn’t someone act on it?

History gives us plenty of warnings. America in the late 1960s and 70s was scarred by political assassinations and bombings. Martin Luther King Jr., Robert Kennedy, George Wallace, and dozens of others were shot. Groups like the Weather Underground carried out attacks in the name of justice. The country was not better for it. It was more divided, more suspicious, and more brutalized. Even earlier, the assassinations of Abraham Lincoln and William McKinley changed the trajectory of American politics for decades. When violence enters the political bloodstream, it poisons everything. It never stays contained.

What is most alarming today is the way violence is rationalized and even celebrated. The shooting of a public figure is no longer met with universal condemnation. Online, it is greeted with jokes and applause. Politicians issue carefully hedged statements, condemning violence in principle while avoiding any serious reflection on how their own rhetoric fuels it. New York City is about to elect a mayor who embodies all of these toxic ideas. This is what decay looks like. Not just the act of violence itself, but the culture that refuses to name its causes.

If this continues, the consequences will not be limited to public figures. Ordinary citizens will begin to believe that speaking their mind is dangerous. They will self-censor. They will retreat from civic life. The result will not be peace but silence, and silence in a democracy is fatal. When people fear that words might cost them their safety, the only voices left will be the most reckless, the most extreme, the most willing to risk everything.

Charlie’s shooting is more than an attack on one man. It is an attack on the belief that persuasion can still work, that Americans can argue instead of kill. If that belief dies, democracy dies with it.

There is still a choice. America can decide that this is the line, that political violence will be met with the full weight of the law, no matter who commits it. Leaders can say plainly that they will not tolerate it, not from their allies, not from their enemies. Citizens can decide to stop rewarding those who dehumanize and start listening to those who argue in good faith.

If we fail to do that, the spiral will tighten. The next assassination attempt will come sooner. The applause online will grow louder. Fear will replace trust. And the country will slip further into a place where bullets, not ballots, decide who has the right to speak.

Today should not only be remembered as the day Charlie Kirk was shot. It should be remembered as the day America was forced to confront whether it still believes in free speech, debate, and the right to disagree without fear of death. If we cannot recover that belief, we will lose the republic that depends on it.

---